In this
blogpost I’ll illustrate my views on how films can make you more aware of
social inequality. I have chosen the two films “The Blind Side” and “Slumdog
Millionaire”, and I’m going to compare how they both deal with social
inequality.
I think
films really can make you more aware of social inequality. By watching you’ll
see an apparent class distinction around the world. You also see how many
people growing up and living in bad conditions. Often a town can be divided
into a rich side and a poor side. There are a lot of people living on the rich
side, and they don’t even think about or notice the poor people. Some of them
don’t even dare to visit the poor side and is thinking bad thoughts about the
people living there. By seeing how people live you should appreciate more what
you have and all the opportunities you have. You should also show more consideration
to others and be aware of that many people suffer and are living in poverty.
I believe
it’s great to see films with social inequality so you get more perspective on
how the world is and how people live. This gives you more knowledge about other
people and you learn to respect everyone and their lifestyle. There shouldn’t
be social inequality in the world, and no one deserves to die because of bad living
conditions.
On school
last week we watched “The Blind Side”. The film is mainly about a family that
takes care of a homeless boy called Michael Oher. The boy has been living in
different foster families since he was little because of his mother’s drug
addiction. He starts at school and doesn’t manage so well. His new family hires
a tutor to give him extra lessons at home. Soon Michael’s school performance
improves. He starts playing football and everyone can see that Michael actually
got football talent. He’s strong and good at protecting himself and the other
team players.
This film
contains social inequality by showing how Michael grew up and the clear
separation between rich and poor in Tennessee. We see that he grew up in a poor
district with almost no clothes, sleeping on the floor, a lot of drugs and
violence. The environment the family lives in is richer, and the people can
afford what they need. We can see a clear social inequality between the two class
distinctions in the city. In the film when Michael and Leigh Anne went to visit
Michaels mother on the poor side, we can see that Leigh Anne is sitting afraid
in the car. You can easily see she doesn’t like the place or the environment
Michael grew up in.
“Slumdog
Millionaire” is about a poor boy called Jamal Malik. He lives in the slum in
India and grows up with bad living conditions. Jamal joins the competition “Who
Wants to Be a Millionaire?” and is one question away from the prize. Then the
police arrest him and suspect him for cheating because of the impossibility of
a “slumdog” knowing all the answers. He uses flashbacks from his life to
remember the answer to the questions, and the film shows many of these. The
film is also about Jamal’s way of finding back to his friend, Latika.
“Slumdog
Millionaire” also contains social inequality in the way the police arrest
Jamal. As said earlier they only arrest him because he’s a “slumdog”. They
think he’s too smart to be able to answer the game-questions. The police are
also treating him bad in prison and they’re hanging him from the ceiling and
giving him electric shock. I believe this is wrong, and I’m sure many others
will agree to this. Jamal is innocent, and they can’t treat him bad and set him
to prison only because of his living conditions. There has to be allowed to
have a lot of knowledge even though you live in the slum.
As a
conclusion I’ll say watching films about social inequality is informative and
helpful for later life. You get more perspective on how the world is and how
people live. Both of the films includes social inequality but in two different
ways. The first one is about two town-sides and the clear distinction, and the
second one about being treated bad because of your lifestyle. Something common
in the films is that people are being thought bad about if they live in
poverty. The poor people in the films are also seen as less worth and dumber
without an education.